Legal Opinion

Fitness Together Franchise, L.L.C. v. EM Fitness, L.L.C.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided October 16, 2020No. 1:20-cv-02757Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Daniel D. Domenico Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02757-DDD-STV FITNESS TOGETHER FRANCHISE, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. EM FITNESS, L.L.C.; FT THREE, L.L.C.; FT POLAND, L.L.C.; AXIO FITNESS CANFIELD, L.L.C.; AXIO FITNESS HOWLAND, L.L.C.; AXIO FITNESS POLAND, L.L.C.; and ERIN MELLINGER, Defendants. ORDER DENYING AXIO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART FITNESS TOGETHER FRANCHISE LLC’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION In a standard franchise agreement, the franchisor allows the fran- chisee to use its marketing…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API