Legal Opinion

Hodgson v. Federal Oil & Development Co.

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided December 16, 1922No. 1273PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, District Judge.

The above-entitled cause is a suit in equity to impress a trust in the nature of an undivided one-eighth interest upon a certain lease or the benefits accruing therefrom granted by the United States Department of the Interior to the defendant Federal Oil & Development Company.

The bill is attacked by a motion to dismiss, alleging facts insufficient to constitute a cause of action, laches and a bar by the statute of limitations, a final determination of the matters involved by the Department of the Interior, and the failure to join the United States as an indispensable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Elder v. McClaskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Joyce v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Taylor v. Salt Creek Consol. Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Republic Production Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Rio Oil Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1964
  3. Eblen v. EblenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Moncrief v. Sohio Petroleum Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hodgson v. Mountain & Gulf Oil Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API