Legal Opinion

People v. Watkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1970No. Crim. 5473PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REGAN, J.

Defendant appeals following judgment of conviction entered after court trial on one count of armed robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.)

Defendant contends that his confession to the above charge was obtained in violation of the rules announced in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974], and that its introduction in evidence over his objection constitutes reversible error. We have concluded that this contention lacks merit and we sustain the judgment of conviction.

About 8:15 p.m. on April 25, 1969, defendant and two companions entered and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. FiorittoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API