People v. Watkins
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, J.
Defendant appeals following judgment of conviction entered after court trial on one count of armed robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.)
Defendant contends that his confession to the above charge was obtained in violation of the rules announced in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974], and that its introduction in evidence over his objection constitutes reversible error. We have concluded that this contention lacks merit and we sustain the judgment of conviction.
About 8:15 p.m. on April 25, 1969, defendant and two companions entered and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. FiorittoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.