United States v. Padilla
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Santiago Padilla, Jr., (“Padilla”) appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute *287and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). He argues that the district court clearly erred in denying his request for a minor role reduction pursuant to § 8B1.2 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Padilla also argues that because the drug quantity was not submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt, his sentence was imposed in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Pantelis Antonakeas, AKA Alexx AntaeusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.