Legal Opinion

Wallowa County v. Fordice

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 2002No. 99-03158; A113714Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

The outcome of this case depends on the answer to a single question: Is military service “employment” for purposes of the workers’ compensation statutes? We agree with the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) that it is. We therefore affirm the board’s award of benefits to claimant, whose hearing loss was caused by military service and subsequent civilian employment.

Claimant served in the United States Army from 1969 to 1971. One year of his service was in combat in Vietnam, where he was exposed daily to the sound of gunshots, mortar fire and exploding bombs. In 1975, claimant went to work for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Runft v. Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Reynolds Metals v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Silveira v. Larch EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Oremus v. Oregonian Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API