Legal Opinion

Payne v. Holiday Towers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 20, 1984No. 0280PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

These consolidated cases arise under the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (the Act). The Paynes and the Hendersons (the Purchasers) sued various defendants for alleged false representations and fraudulent concealments in connection with the sale of condominium units at Myrtle Beach. When Memorial Investment Corporation failed to answer timely, the Purchasers moved for a default judgment against it. Memorial then moved to vacate the affidavit of default and for leave to file a late answer. The court denied Memorial’s motion and granted a default judgment on the issue of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Laird v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. United Postage Corp. v. KammeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Simon v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Haddad v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Doering v. FaderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Bessinger v. Food Lion, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
  5. Jefferies v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API