Legal Opinion

Fishel v. Motta

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 18, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action to foreclose a judgment lien, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County and tried to the court, Coats, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants, .and appeal by the plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, C. J.

In January, 1901, the plaintiffs brought a suit against the defendant Motta, in which they attached whatever interest he then had in the land covered by the judgment lien sought to be foreclosed in the present suit. Subsequently, in April, 1901, they obtained judgment against him in the attachment suit, and upon that judgment filed the lien here in question. When the attachment was made, however, the record title to the land attached stood in the name of Motta’s wife.

The complaint in this case, after alleging that the plaintiffs had thus obtained judgment against Motta in the attachment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Hawes v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
  3. Redfield v. BuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
  4. Gilligan v. LordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Town Bank & Trust Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Albert Mendel & Son, Inc. v. KroghConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Chambers v. Blickle Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Doty v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Daly Brothers, Inc. v. SpalloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API