Legal Opinion

Dippel v. Hargrave

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1952No. 34839PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The only issue of fact contested in this action was whether or not there was a partnership relation between the original defendants, Bill Ernest Dippel and Bill Riggs. The appeal is predicated on alleged error in the admission of incompetent and prejudicial evidence and error in certain instructions given and in the refusal of the trial court to give requested instructions. The jury decided the issue of fact in favor of plaintiff Russell Hargrave. Defendant Bill Dippel, alone, appeals.

Plaintiff Hargrave was a resident of Hydro, in Caddo county. Defendant Dippel resided in Custer county, near…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gafford v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Elam v. LoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Cross v. Burlington National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Rizer v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Wood v. Kerr Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. The Reverend Richmond F. Thweatt, Iii, Father and Next Friend of Richmond F. Thweatt, Iv, a Minor Child v. Dr. Joseph A. Ontko, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc. v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. City of Enid v. ReeserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API