National Labor Relations Board v. Lunder Shoe Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., has petitioned this court for enforcement of its order against respondents Lunder Shoe Corp., d.b.a. Bruce Shoe Co. (hereinafter called Lunder), and Bruce Shoe Co., Inc. (hereinafter called Bruce). We have jurisdiction under § 10(e) of the Act.
On March 26, 1952 the United Shoe Workers of America, C.I.O. (hereinafter called the Union) filed charges of unfair labor practices against respondent Lun-der. On August 12, 1952,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Southport Petroleum Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In the Matter of David Livingston, as President of District 65, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Aflcio v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Auto Ventshade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- United States Pipe and Foundry Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.