Winegar v. Gray
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
In this action both the plaintiff, respondent herein, and the defendant, appellant herein, by appropriate pleadings, asked for a declaration of their rights under three written agreements upon which both of them relied; the trial court found a breach thereof by the defendant; judgment for damages in favor of the plaintiff was entered; and the defendant appeals.
The three agreements in question concerned the manufacture and sale of an article known as a spray gun air cap, upon which the defendant had a patent; purported to vest in the plaintiff the exclusive license to manufacture and sell the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- City of San Diego v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local 127California Court of Appeal · 1970
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- National Steel Products Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Integrated, Inc. v. Alec Fergusson Electrical ContractorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.