Legal Opinion

Winegar v. Gray

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1962No. Civ. 6727PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

In this action both the plaintiff, respondent herein, and the defendant, appellant herein, by appropriate pleadings, asked for a declaration of their rights under three written agreements upon which both of them relied; the trial court found a breach thereof by the defendant; judgment for damages in favor of the plaintiff was entered; and the defendant appeals.

The three agreements in question concerned the manufacture and sale of an article known as a spray gun air cap, upon which the defendant had a patent; purported to vest in the plaintiff the exclusive license to manufacture and sell the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of San Diego v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local 127California Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. National Steel Products Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Integrated, Inc. v. Alec Fergusson Electrical ContractorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API