Legal Opinion

Patton v. Rushefsky

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided February 10, 2021No. 6:21-cv-06008Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION RICHARD R. PATTON PLAINTIFF v. Civil No. 6:21-cv-06008 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; ARKANSAS COMMUNITY OF CORRECTION; DR. BERYL RUSHEFSKY; and DR. ALBERT KITTRELL DEFENDANTS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This is a civil rights action filed by Plaintiff Richard R. Patton pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3)(2011), the Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge, referred this case to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Martin v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Randall Jackson v. Jay NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API