Wells v. Oregon Ry. & N. Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
In Equity. Suits for injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.
These suits were commenced on December 11, 1882, and on the same day an order was made in each requiring the defendant therein to show cause why a provisional injunction should not issue, as prayed for in the bill; and also that in the mean time the defendants be so restrained. On January 25-6 the motions for provisional injunctions were heard at length—all the questions which can or may arise in the cases being argued by counsel with much zeal and ability. Contemporaneous with those, a similar suit was commenced by the plaintiff in Washington territory against the Northern Pacific Bailway…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- New England Express Co. v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
- Sargent v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Brooks v. BicknellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1843
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commercial Union of America, Inc. v. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Shreve v. CheesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Shredded Wheat Co. v. Kellogg Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1928
- Atlantic & P. R. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1896
- Wells v. Oregon & C. Ry. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.