Brooks v. Bicknell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
[In. equity. Bill by Moses Brooks and Joseph L. Morris against Benjamin Bick-neli and. Ebenezer Jenkins to enjoin infringement of a patent for an improvement in wood-working machines, granted to William Woodworth, December 27, 1828, and extended to his administrator February 1G, 1842, and for other relief.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT. The complainants represent in their bill, that on or about the 4th of December, 1828, William Woodworth, now deceased, was the inventor •of a certain improvement, or machine, for planing, grooving, and tongueing boards, and other materials, and for which, having ■complied with every legal requisite, he obtained a patent, dated the 27th of December, 3828, to him, his heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns, for the term of fourteen .years. That the patent, after the 15th day •of December, 183G, was duly recorded anew, in the patent office, as required by law. That…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Livingston v. Van IngenCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812
- Post v. KimberlyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812
- Davis v. PalmerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1827
- Ogle v. EgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1826
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moffitt v. GarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Wells v. Oregon Ry. & N. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1883
- Silas Farmer v. Calvert Lithographing, Engraving & Map Publishing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1872