Legal Opinion
Wesley McIndoo v. Harold Burnett
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1974No. 73-1875PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit-Judge.
The issue for decision in this appeal is whether the Illinois two-year statute of limitations or the Missouri four-year statute of limitations should be applied. Honorable John W. Oliver, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, held that the Illinois statute was applicable and granted summary judgment for defendant-appellee, Harold Burnett. Plaintiff, Wesley Mclndoo, appeals. We affirm.
The facts are not in dispute. Mc-lndoo and Burnett, Missouri residents, 1 agreed to travel together in Burnett’s ear to a bowling tournament in Illinois.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Larry Luke, Individually v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Larry Luke, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Joan Evans Wilburn v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hoover v. SumlinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Jerry A. Beeck and Judy A. Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Carson P. ex rel Foreman v. HeinemanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2007
- Richard M. Patch v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. And Frank BrowningCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Quality Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. City of SpencerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.