Legal Opinion

Stork v. Townsend

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 27, 1940No. 62PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, District Judge.

On January 27, 1940, plaintiff, a citizen of the State of Michigan, filed his complaint herein against defendants, praying for damages in the sum of four thousand, three hundred and twenty-two dollars and seventy cents ($4,322.70).

On February 23, 1940, defendants filed a motion wherein they moved to strike certain items of damage from the complaint, as in the motion set forth. On August 7, 1940, this court rendered a decision sustaining the foregoing motion in part and overruling it in part. At the same time the court treated a portion of the motion to strike as a motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Journal & Tribune Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Stork v. TownsendDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dickheiser v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Beach Development Corp. v. StimsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Alvarez Garcia v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Kevin Overall v. Transportation Commodities, Inc. dba Transportation ConceptsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API