Legal Opinion

Stork v. Townsend

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 7, 1940No. 62 CivPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, District Judge.

On January 27, 1940, plaintiff, a citizen of the State of Michigan, filed his complaint herein against defendants. Plaintiff prays for damages in the sum of $4,322.70. This total sum is made up of a number of items designated in the complaint alphabetically from (a) to (p), inclusive. Plaintiff alleges that because of fraud, misrepresentations, deceit and breach of warranty, and as a direct and natural result thereof he has sustained the damages set forth in the amounts alleged in the respective items referred to, totalling, as indicated, $4,322.-70.

On February 23, 1940,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrett Co. v. Panther Rubber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
  2. Segal v. Horwitz Bros.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Augustine v. Southern Bell Telephone & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Stork v. TownsendDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940
  3. Maryland v. Acme Poultry Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API