Legal Opinion

Heilig v. Continental Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1935No. Gen. No. 37,895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant to recover $1,500, which he claims is an obligation incurred by him in employing’ an attorney to secure the vacation of a judgment of $3,500 entered against plaintiff in a personal injury ease, on the ground that it was defendant’s duty to perform such services. There was a trial before the court without a jury and a finding and judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $418.50, and defendant appeals.

The record discloses that defendant, Continental Casualty Company, a corporation, issued its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edgerton v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bruner v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. American Credit Indemnity Co. of New York v. YamerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Newport v. McPhersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  5. Capital State Savings Bank v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynn v. Village of West CityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Mitchell v. TatumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Krutsinger v. Illinois Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API