Legal Opinion
Zelman v. JDS Uniphase Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 13, 2005No. C-02-4656 WWSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.
Shirley Zelman, a purchaser of securities called GOALs, brings this securities fraud action against JDS Uniphase Corporation (JDSU) and four of its former directors on behalf of herself and other GOALs purchasers. JDSU and Kevin Kalkhoven, one of its former directors, have moved separately to dismiss the Complaint. For the reasons presented below, the Court denies the JDSU defendants’ motion to dismiss and grants in part Kalkhoven’s motion to dismiss, with leave to amend.
BACKGROUND
Since the Court is considering Defendants’ motions to dismiss, the following…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Refco, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- WPP Luxembourg Gamma Three Sarl v. Spot Runner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.