Legal Opinion
WPP Luxembourg Gamma Three Sarl v. Spot Runner, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2011No. 10-55401, 10-55464, 10-55468PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee WPP Luxembourg Gamma Three Sari (“WPP”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of the amended complaint. The district court dismissed the amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for having failed to state a claim. Defendant-Appellees and Cross-Appellants (“Defendant-Appellees”) cross-appeal the district court’s decision to dismiss some of WPP’s claims without prejudice.
WPP generally alleges that amidst large operating losses unknown to investors, Spot Runner executives solicited WPP to buy shares…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund v. Apollo Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lorenzo v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- The Depot, Inc. v. Caring for Montanans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- David Orr v. Tom ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.