Legal Opinion

Sterling Novelty Co. v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 4, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

This proceeding was commenced when the Commonwealth filed a motion in the Fayette County Court to condemn and forfeit 142 slot machines, identified in the motion by serial numbers. Sterling Novelty Company, owner of the machines, was designated as the defendant. A jury in county court found that the machines were “ultimately intended to be used for gambling” and judgment was entered ordering their destruction.

An appeal was taken by the Novelty Company to circuit court and the proceeding was tried, over objection of the Company, as a criminal case. The circuit court jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Three One-Ball Pinball Machines v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Medallion Stores, Inc. v. EidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Machines v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  4. Department of Revenue, Finance & Administration Cabinet v. Shinin' B Trailer Sales, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
  5. Medallion Stores, Inc. v. EidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API