Legal Opinion

Machines v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 10, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

In a forfeiture proceeding under KRS 436.280, the jury found that 14 “console type” slot machines, which had been seized by the-sheriff of Fayette County, were gambling devices, and judgment was entered that the machines be forfeited and destroyed.

On this appeal by the slot machines (through their owner), the main contention is that the machines were seized illegally, and therefore the forfeiture proceeding should have been quashed.

The machines were seized without a warrant, by the sheriff of Fayette County on May 6, 1953, upon their arrival in a truck in front of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Walters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Clark v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Sterling Novelty Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  5. Three One-Ball Pinball Machines v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Merchandise SeizedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Brown v. Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. AB Long Music Company v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API