Kirby Hollins and Lydia Hollins v. 3M Company and 3M Company v. Berean Energy Corporation, et al.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON KIRBY HOLLINS and ) LYDIA HOLLINS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) 3M COMPANY, ) ) Defendant, ) No. 6:26-CV-12-REW-CJS ) and ) ) OPINION & ORDER 3M COMPANY, ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BEREAN ENERGY CORPORATION, ) et al., ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) *** *** *** *** In December 2023, Kirby and Lydia Hollins (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated the present action against 3M Company (“3M”). See DE 1 (Complaint). 3M filed a motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiffs’ purported failure to comply with…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.