Legal Opinion

Kirby Hollins and Lydia Hollins v. 3M Company and 3M Company v. Berean Energy Corporation, et al.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided September 25, 2026No. 6:26-cv-00012Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON KIRBY HOLLINS and ) LYDIA HOLLINS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) 3M COMPANY, ) ) Defendant, ) No. 6:26-CV-12-REW-CJS ) and ) ) OPINION & ORDER 3M COMPANY, ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BEREAN ENERGY CORPORATION, ) et al., ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) *** *** *** *** In December 2023, Kirby and Lydia Hollins (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated the present action against 3M Company (“3M”). See DE 1 (Complaint). 3M filed a motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiffs’ purported failure to comply with…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API