Legal Opinion

Daniels v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2010No. 06-CF-265PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellant, Andrew Daniels, of first-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence and carrying a pistol without a license. 1 Mr. Daniels contends that the trial court committed reversible error by (1) admitting hearsay statements during the testimony of two government witnesses; (2) permitting improper prosecuto-rial comments during the government’s rebuttal argument; and (B) convicting him of conduct protected under the Second Amendment to the Constitution. 2 Discerning neither reversible trial court error nor abuse of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas R. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Brian K. Gilliam, John A. Daniels, and Ronald L. English v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Melendez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. CURTIS L. MCKNIGHT and ROBERT H. PUMPHREY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Eddie Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API