Legal Opinion

Becker v. Baumgartner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1892No. 661PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, C. J.

The complaint upon which appellee recovered below is in substance as follows : Appellants were engaged in the business of manufacturing wagons in the city of Evansville, and appellee was employed by them to run the engine for their manufacturing ■establishment, and to perform such other work therein as might be required of him ; that on the 15th day of May, 1891, while so engaged, appellee was required to shift a belt from one pulley to anothei’, which propelled a circular saw, and to saw out some lumber; that said belt was “old,worn,frayed and rotten,” and appellants had carelessly and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. StupakIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. EastmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Buehner Chair Co. v. FeulnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. NeubacherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WoodwardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Guedelhofer v. ErnstingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API