Becker v. Baumgartner
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, C. J.
The complaint upon which appellee recovered below is in substance as follows : Appellants were engaged in the business of manufacturing wagons in the city of Evansville, and appellee was employed by them to run the engine for their manufacturing ■establishment, and to perform such other work therein as might be required of him ; that on the 15th day of May, 1891, while so engaged, appellee was required to shift a belt from one pulley to anothei’, which propelled a circular saw, and to saw out some lumber; that said belt was “old,worn,frayed and rotten,” and appellants had carelessly and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. StupakIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. EastmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Buehner Chair Co. v. FeulnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. NeubacherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WoodwardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Guedelhofer v. ErnstingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.