Legal Opinion

Downing v. Lane County State & Savings Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

This controversy is governed by the facts. The law applicable is simple and settled. Did plaintiff authorize said Bergman to invest, loan, collect and reinvest her funds as her agent? The question may be propounded in another way: Was plaintiff represented by her brother, E. S. Downing, authorizing the bank to so handle her funds without further consulting her?

E. S. Downing and said Henry Bergman were business associates and personal friends. Bergman was frequently at the home of said Downing in North Bend. Some of the money belonging to plaintiff, Pauline Downing, was loaned to business…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shute v. HinmanOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Miller v. Viola State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Carlon v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Verrell v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Byron v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chapple v. Merchants National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API