Legal Opinion

Shute v. Hinman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1899PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From Washington : Thos. A. McBride, Judge. Proceeding by J. W. Shute, administrator, against A. Hinman, assignee. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is a proceeding to require the assignee of the estate of Anton Pfanner, insolvent, to pay the administrator of Martin Manning, deceased, $879.84 out of the moneys coming into his hands as assignee, on the ground that it is a trust fund. The facts are that on February 3, 1896, Pfanner was appointed and qualified as administrator of the estate of Martin Manning, deceased, and acted as such until June, 1897, when he was removed by the county court, and the present petitioner appointed in his stead. Soon after his appointment as administrator, Pfanner purchased and assumed control of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Ferchen v. ArndtOregon Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Lincoln v. MorrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Widman v. KelloggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Peoples State Bank of MaywoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of KrugerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  5. Bellevue State Bank v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API