Legal Opinion

Miller v. Viola State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1926No. 26,490PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

On August 31, 1921, James Miller brought an action against the Viola State Bank seeking a recovery on two causes of action. He died during the litigation, and his administratrix was substituted as plaintiff. The bank was closed on October 20, 1921, and a receiver, subsequently appointed, has been made a defendant. On each cause of action a preferred claim was asserted and allowed. The receiver appeals, and contends not only that the claims are not entitled to a preference, but that they do not constitute any charge whatever against the bank…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Preston v. PratherSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Lowndes v. City National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  3. Merchants National Bank v. GuilmartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Maddock v. RiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Foster v. President of the Essex BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Kershaw v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Docking v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Winkler v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. O'MALLEY v. Putnam Safe Deposit Vaults, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API