Legal Opinion
Ricardo Nova v. George Bartlett, Superintendent Elmira Correctional Facility
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 3, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner-Appeñant Ricardo Nova appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Constance Baker Motley, Judge) denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Nova alleges that he was improperly interrogated by the police before he received the warning required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The district court held, although with obvious misgivings, that Nova was not in custody prior to the receipt of his warnings. Nova v. Bartlett, 63 F.Supp.2d 449, 457-58 (S.D.N.Y.1999). The court further held…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cunningham v. ConwayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Alfini v. LordDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Mastin v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Dallio v. SpitzerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. GrahamDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.