Legal Opinion
United States v. Graham
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 26, 2000No. Crim. 3:99CR271(CFD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS
DRONEY, District Judge.
The defendant, Kimberly Graham, was indicted for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100.grams and more of mixtures and substances containing a detectable amount of phencyclidine (PCP) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. She has filed a motion to suppress physical evidence, a motion to suppress statements, and a motion to suppress evidence seized from her residence. For the following reasons, each of the motions to suppress is DENIED
I. Background
The defendant claims several violations of the Fourth, Fifth, and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SanchezOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bernard West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- United States v. GoinsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- United States v. McKREITHDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010