Legal Opinion

Mills v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 2, 1995No. CR 95-428PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of committing the crimes of rape and sexual abuse against two young boys. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment and ten years. His point of appeal is procedurally barred. A review of the transcript in accordance with Rule 4-3(h) of the Rules of the Supreme Court discloses no rulings adverse to appellant that constitute reversible error.

Appellant contends that a witness, Tamara Pelton, was allowed to give hearsay testimony. The issue came about as follows. After the prosecuting attorney asked Ms. Pelton a number of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Friar v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Byrum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Withers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Cheqnet Systems, Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API