Cheqnet Systems, Inc. v. Montgomery
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the certification of a class. See Ark. R. App. P. 2(a)(9). We affirm the certification. The facts are that Susan Montgomery filed a class-action complaint in which she alleged that Cheqnet Systems, Inc., committed multiple violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (1994). Cheqnet filed a motion to dismiss in which it contended that Montgomery failed to meet the requirements for class certification pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 23. Montgomery filed an amended class-action complaint, again alleging…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Summons v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Union National Bank v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- In Re West Virginia Rezulin LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. McCaffery v. HutchisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Mega Life and Health Ins. Co. v. JacolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.