Legal Opinion

Cheqnet Systems, Inc. v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1995No. 95-779PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the certification of a class. See Ark. R. App. P. 2(a)(9). We affirm the certification. The facts are that Susan Montgomery filed a class-action complaint in which she alleged that Cheqnet Systems, Inc., committed multiple violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (1994). Cheqnet filed a motion to dismiss in which it contended that Montgomery failed to meet the requirements for class certification pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 23. Montgomery filed an amended class-action complaint, again alleging…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Summons v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Union National Bank v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. In Re West Virginia Rezulin LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State ex rel. McCaffery v. HutchisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Mega Life and Health Ins. Co. v. JacolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API