Legal Opinion

Woodland Hills Residents Assn. v. City Council

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1975No. Civ. 43293PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOOD, P. J.

Plaintiff Woodland Hills Residents Association, Inc., petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandamus compelling each respondent (city council, planning commission, advisory agency) to vacate its decision approving a tract map of a proposed subdivision to be made by Consolidated Resources, Inc., (real party in interest) in Woodland Hills. It may be stated generally that, in a hillside area of 38 acres, Consolidated proposed to cut approximately 90 feet from the top of a ridge and fill the adjacent valleys with 750,000 cubic yards of earth, thereby creating a mesa that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API