Woodland Hills Residents Assn. v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOOD, P. J.
Plaintiff Woodland Hills Residents Association, Inc., petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandamus compelling each respondent (city council, planning commission, advisory agency) to vacate its decision approving a tract map of a proposed subdivision to be made by Consolidated Resources, Inc., (real party in interest) in Woodland Hills. It may be stated generally that, in a hillside area of 38 acres, Consolidated proposed to cut approximately 90 feet from the top of a ridge and fill the adjacent valleys with 750,000 cubic yards of earth, thereby creating a mesa that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by29 opinions
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.