Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1990No. 638-89PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of forgery and assessed his punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at 50 years imprisonment. This conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Williams v. State, No. 01-86-379-CR, 1988 WL 45429 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st], delivered May 5, 1988). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review and remanded in light of Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1988). Williams v. State, No. 593-88 (Tex.Cr.App. delivered October 5, 1988). The Court of Appeals again affirmed in an unpublished…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Ex Parte LunaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Ex Parte LopezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Huff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Abbott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  4. McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API