Legal Opinion

State of Indiana v. David Brown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2017No. 49S05-1606-CR-348PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David, Justice.

This case involves whether the brief detainment of defendant as part of a sobriety checkpoint is custodial so as to trigger Miranda protection. We hold that such detainment is no more custodial than a routine traffic or Terry stop, and thus, defendant was not entitled to Miranda warnings at the sobriety checkpoint.

Facts and Procedural History

In July 2013, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police set up a field sobriety checkpoint to apprehend impaired drivers. Officers set up the checkpoint at the back of a well-lit Arby’s parking lot and were instructed that they had no more than…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Pennsylvania v. BruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. QuirkIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. B.A. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Scott Randall v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State of Indiana v. Ernesto RuizIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State of Indiana v. Lawrence LucasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Joseph C. Hudson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API