Legal Opinion
Joseph C. Hudson v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 2019No. Court of Appeals Case 18A-CR-2628PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Riley, Judge.
*223 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
[1] Appellant-Defendant, Joseph C. Hudson (Hudson), appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence.
[2] We affirm.
ISSUES
[3] Hudson raises two issues in this interlocutory appeal, which we restate as:(1) Whether the trial court properly denied Hudson's motion to suppress his statements made prior to being given Miranda warnings; and(2) Whether the trial court properly denied Hudson's motion to suppress the evidence discovered pursuant to a warrantless search of his vehicle.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[4] On April 29, 2016, Officer…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Tellez-Salinas v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Jackelin Andrea Ramirez-Vera v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Jesse Doyle, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Michael Scanland v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019