Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hassett

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 26, 1942No. 954, 955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

This case presents what must be. an ever-recurring question in fiduciary accounting under the federal income tax law: may testamentary trustees of the residue of an estate in their fiduciary federal income tax return deduct interest they paid on account of the testator’s federal estate tax?

Charles H. Jones, the testator, named the same persons as executors of his will and as trustees of the residue of his estate. In 1936 they as executors had distributed some of their assets to themselves as trustees, but had retained in. excess of $300,000. In that year they as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Parkhurst v. GinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Penrose v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Bridge v. BridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BeebeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of JacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Nunan v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Jones v. HassettDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
  4. Reller v. HaysNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API