Legal Opinion

Estate of Jacks

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1947No. Civ. 13328PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

By the decree of distribution in the estate of Vida Jacks certain property was distributed to trustees to be held in trust as provided in the will and in the decree of distribution. Thereafter the trustees filed their “First Account and Report of Trustees, Petition for Settlement and for Instructions,” and Romie C. Jacks, brother of the testatrix, filed objections thereto, contending that the trustees had acted improperly in charging certain property taxes, certain interest on a deficiency on the federal estate tax, and certain payments made to him, against the income of the trust, it being…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Penrose v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of CroniseNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. Jones v. HassettDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Hall v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Estate of HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In re the Estate of LecompteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
  5. Burwell v. McCabeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API