Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Gentillon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2013No. 38878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

Appellants Lamon “Mont” and Lori Gentillon as well as Wes and Connie Gentillon (the Partnership) appeal from the district court’s order granting title to all but .34 acres of a disputed parcel of land and a 30-foot easement in favor of Craig and Janice Peterson (the Petersons) in an action to quiet title to certain portions of riparian and agricultural land in Bingham County, Idaho. In 1998, the Partnership entered into a three-party agreement in which they purchased the majority of Scott and Tracy Gentillon’s farm and were to exchange three small parcels of land with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Washington Federal SavingsIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Beckstead v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Viersen v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donald Steuerer v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Mace v. LutherIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Cave Bay Community Services v. LohmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2026
  4. Easterling v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Easterling v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API