Legal Opinion

Cade v. Hoff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1953No. 36,001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents move to dismiss an appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion for amended findings or a new trial.

This case, which involves a will contest, was heard and disposed of on the merits upon a prior appeal. See, In re Estate of Hartz, 237 Minn. 313, 54 N. W. (2d) 784. In such prior appeal, although all issues were determined in favor of the proponents of the will including the issue of whether the evidence sustained the trial court’s findings, the order appealed from was reversed and the case was remanded to the trial court for a vacation of the findings and for a reconsideration…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cade v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McClelland v. McClellandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Hough Transit, Ltd. v. HarigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Sand v. CadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. In Re Estate of HartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Wurdemann v. HjelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API