Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Hartz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 18, 1956No. 36,725PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
247 Minn. 362 (1956)
77 N.W. (2d) 169
IN RE ESTATE OF HENRY HARTZ.
V.C. SAND AND OTHERS
v.
ELIZABETH CADE AND OTHERS.
No. 36,725.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 18, 1956.
Clifford W. Gardner and Burkhardt & Dunlap, for appellants.
Holst, Erickson, Vogel & Richardson and Foley & Foley, for respondents.
THOMAS GALLAGHER, JUSTICE.
Appeal from a judgment wherein the district court reversed an order of the probate court of Wabasha County and determined that respondents here, cousins of Henry Hartz, deceased, and contestants of his last will, were entitled to bequests of $1,000 each as provided for therein.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wadsworth v. BrighamOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Kitchen v. BallardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- South Norwalk Trust Co. v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Friend's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Tate v. CampTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Matter of Estate of SeymourNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Bronwyn Benoist Parker v. William Dean BenoistMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Machover v. Estate of MachoverSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.