Legal Opinion

Hurtado v. Brady

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 2007No. 05CA2556PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

In this intentional tort action arising out of an alleged sexual assault, plaintiff, Romie Hurtado, appeals the judgment dismissing her claims against defendant, Timothy K. Brady, D.C., on statute of limitations grounds. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.

In 2001, Hurtado was injured in an automobile accident and received chiropractic treatment for her injuries. On April 8, 2008, at her insurer's request, Hurtado saw Brady, a chiropractor, for an independent medical examination (IME) to evaluate the reasonableness and necessity of continuing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Coors Brewing Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Dorman v. Petrol Aspen, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. SwainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Shapiro & Meinhold v. ZartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hemmann Management Services v. Mediacell, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Apodaca v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Portercare Adventist Health System v. LegoColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Estate of Guido v. Exempla, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. City of Colorado Springs v. Andersen Mahon Enterprises, LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API