Legal Opinion
Shapiro & Meinhold v. Zartman
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 13, 1992No. 90SC758PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
We granted certiorari to review Zartman v. Shapiro & Meinhold, 811 P.2d 409 (Colo.App.1990), and now affirm. We limited our review to a determination of whether the petitioners, attorneys who sought to enforce a power of sale contained in a deed of trust securing a note pursuant to C.R.C.P. 120, are “debt collectors” for purposes of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692-1692o (1988) (FDCPA).
The named respondents, James Zartman, Mary DeLancy, and Robert Morphew (debtors), allegedly defaulted on consumer loans secured by real property in Colorado. The petitioners, Shapiro and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. GuentherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Mary Crossley v. Arnold R. LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Espinoza v. O'DELLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Lawrence Glazer v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Karen Wilson v. Draper & Goldberg, P.L.L.C. L. Darren GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Dorman v. Petrol Aspen, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. HeisermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.