Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Morales v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 2008No. A120115PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, Acting P. J.

The treatment and management of condemned inmates from the time an execution date is set through completion of the execution is subject to a protocol issued on May 15, 2007, by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and CDCR Secretary James E. Tilton (Tilton) (collectively appellants). The protocol, Operational Procedure No. 0-770, is formally titled “STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN QUENTIN OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE NUMBER 0-770: EXECUTION BY LETHAL INJECTION” (hereafter OP 770). Two condemned inmates, respondents Michael Morales and Mitchell Sims,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Brosterhous v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Shin v. AhnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Morning Star Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Payton v. CullenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Jones v. ChappellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
  4. Coleman v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  5. American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API