Legal Opinion

Dominik Stone v. Charles Schwab & Company Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 5, 2026No. 2:24-cv-03047Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Dominik Stone, No. CV-24-03047-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Charles Schwab & Company Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 Pending before the Court is Defendant Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.’s Second Partial 15 Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 36), and Plaintiff Dominik Stone’s, who is proceeding pro se, 16 Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) (Doc. 35). Having reviewed the briefing and the 17 relevant case law, the Court grants Defendant’s Motion. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiff previously filed a SAC asserting ten claims…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API