Legal Opinion
A.T. Cross Co. v. Royal Selangor(s) PTE, Ltd.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided September 3, 2002No. C.A. 01-625 LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Senior District Judge.
The matter presently before the Court is plaintiffs motion to stay an arbitration proceeding. Plaintiff, A.T. Cross. Co. (“A. T. Cross”), has filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that it is not subject to arbitration proceedings initiated by defendant, Royal Selangor(s) PTE, Ltd. (“Royal Selangor”). Plaintiff contends that the arbitration clause in the alleged contract was never agreed to by the parties and therefore is not enforceable. Defendant objects to the motion to stay arbitration, contending that it is the role of the arbitrator,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Stenzel v. Dell, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Johnson v. Polaris Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- HOUSE v. VANCE FORD-LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.