Legal Opinion
Nyquist v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1924No. 4023PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error, with several others, was charged, under section 37 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10201), with conspiring to violate the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act (Act Oct. 29, 1919, c. 89, U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1923, §§ 10418b-10418f), known as the Dyer Act, by transporting in interstate and foreign commerce certain stolen motor vehicles, and by receiving, concealing, storing, and otherwise disposing of the same when a part of and constituting interstate and foreign commerce. The substantial conspiracy charged involved the transportation of stolen vehicles…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Rudner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Continental Baking Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Banning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.