Legal Opinion
Banning v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1942No. 9071PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Herman Banning and Frank Williams, together with John McMann, were indicted for a violation of the National Stolen Property Act, Title 18 U.S. C.A. §§ 413 to 419, inclusive. The indictment contained two counts, the first charging appellants with conspiring with each other, McMann and others unknown to the Grand Jury, to transport in interstate commerce, jewelry and diamond rings of the approximate value of $11,000.00 knowing same to have been stolen, and the second count charging appellants and McMann with the substantive offense of transporting in…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. David AldacoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Commonwealth v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Charles Edward Matthews, Ezekiel Brown and Raymond Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Commonwealth v. FordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.