Legal Opinion

Birk v. City of Bremerton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1925No. 19306. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action is for the recovery of damages for the loss occasioned by fire of household goods which had been stored in a municipal wharf and warehouse belonging to appellant. Two causes of action were alleged: one for the loss of household goods alleged to be of the value of $1,062.50, delivered to appellant as a warehouseman; and the second, for the loss of a trunk valued at ten dollars, alleged to have been held by the city as a common carrier, by reason of having been delivered to it by a transportation company known as the Navy Yard Route, shortly before the fire, without .notice of its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Pacific Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Sporsem v. First National Bank of PoulsboWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Colburn v. Washington State Art Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McDonald v. Wm. D. Perkins & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Burley v. Hurley-Mason Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Georgian Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Chaloupka v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Dohrmann Hotel Supply Co. v. Owl Transfer & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Rubinstein v. Washington Cold Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API