Legal Opinion
Dohrmann Hotel Supply Co. v. Owl Transfer & Storage Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1943No. 29086PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This action was instituted by the Dohrmann Hotel Supply Company, a corporation, against Owl Transfer & Storage Company, a corporation, in the superior court for King county, to recover the reasonable replacement cost and value of certain goods delivered to defendant as a common carrier, and alleged to have been negligently damaged by defendant.
The complaint, in substance, alleged that the defendant was operating as a common carrier of freight (local cartage) in the city of Seattle; that, on or about October 10, 1941, plaintiff delivered into the care and custody of defendant as a common…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Kettenhofen v. Globe Transfer & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Burr v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Lagomarsino v. Pacific Alaska Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General American Transp. Corp. v. Indiana Harbor Belt R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Middle Atlantic Conference v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972
- American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board (Now Federal Maritime Commission) and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Chaloupka v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Union Packing Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.