Legal Opinion

Burke v. Wilber

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Iosco. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Wilber sued Burke and recovered judgment against him under the following circumstances, the only questions disputed on the trial being the amount of consideration, and the fact of an account stated.

• Wilber made a bargain with Burke for the sale to him of certain lands the title whereof was in John Phelps. Wilber’s statement, which the jury accepted as the truth, was in substance that Phelps held the title but Wilber had an interest of one-half in it after certain deductions were made for outlays, and that it was agreed between him and Burke that Wilber should have $1500 for his interest, —…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holland v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Whoram v. Township of ArgentineMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bauman v. BeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Pangburn v. SiffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API