Burke v. Wilber
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Iosco. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Wilber sued Burke and recovered judgment against him under the following circumstances, the only questions disputed on the trial being the amount of consideration, and the fact of an account stated.
• Wilber made a bargain with Burke for the sale to him of certain lands the title whereof was in John Phelps. Wilber’s statement, which the jury accepted as the truth, was in substance that Phelps held the title but Wilber had an interest of one-half in it after certain deductions were made for outlays, and that it was agreed between him and Burke that Wilber should have $1500 for his interest, —…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Holland v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Whoram v. Township of ArgentineMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Bauman v. BeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Pangburn v. SiffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.